Home > Issues > Politicians > Andrew Little Lies Like a Girl.
	Empowering Men: fighting feminist lies
Andrew Little Lies Like a Girl. Peter Zohrab 2018

(Open Letter to the Minister of Justice)

Dear Mr. Little,

Re: Your lying claim that Ruth Busch is "an expert on family violence" (http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA1808/S00203/family-justice-reforms-experts-announced.htm)

The above webpage announces the names of your so-called "Family Justice reforms experts", including Ruth Busch, who you call "an expert on family violence". However, she is just a retired Law teacher.

You have a Law degree -- as do I -- and both of us know very well that the Law includes statutes, rules and regulations, but does not include substantive matters, such as Family Violence, which comes under Psychology. A competent Psychologist who studied Family Violence would be knowledgeable about many of the works listed in Professor Martin Fiebert's Annotated Domestic Violence Bibliography , which

Therefore Ruth Busch cannot possibly be, as far as her previous teaching activities are concerned, "an expert on family violence". As you presumably also know, she has apparently worked closely with a Psychologist from Waikato University, Neville Robertson. The Green Party supports your Labour-led Government and Jan Logie, the Green MP, is your Under-Secretary for Justice (Domestic and Sexual Violence Issues). So it must be that Jan Logie, who is a Fascist, man-hating Dyke, wanted Ruth Busch, who is another Fascist, man-hating dyke, to be your so-called "expert on family violence" -- perhaps because they couldn't trust Neville Robertson to be anti-male enough.

Nevertheless, she is not "an expert on family violence", so you are a liar!

Now, if you would like to see the kind of garbage that Ruth Busch and Neville Robertson churn out, have a look at their article, "I Didn't Know Just How Far You Could Fight: Contextualising The Bristol Inquiry".

In Section II "A Foreword to Christine's Story", they make it clear what the "factual details" are that they think are needed to retrospectively justify the recommendations of the Bristol Inquiry which resulted in the Fascist Domestic Violence Act that we have had since 1995. They state at the beginning of Section II:

In case that is not clear enough, they go on to refer (four sentences further on) to:

Unlike you (I guess), I have studied Psychology as well as Law, including the Massey University third-year paper "The Practice of Psychological Research", during which Antonia Lyons taught us that there was no such thing as objectivity. I dropped out of that paper (in 2007) when she refused to permit me to carry out some research on Domestic Violence.

I put the following points to you:

See also:

• Racist and Sexist Predetermination in the Media

• The Coming New Zealand Civil War

• The Feminist Priestly Caste of "Experts"

• Review: "The Battered Woman" by Lenore E. Walker

• The Influence of Non-Legal Research on Legal Approaches to Ex Parte Domestic Violence Protection Orders

• Gender Differences in Domestic Violence: an Open Letter to Professor Fergusson

• Green MP Jan Logie Proves that Women's Suffrage Should Be Repealed.

• Research on Domestic Violence in New Zealand

• Lying Logie Cons Parliament Into Convicting Innocent Men.

• Abolish Women's Refuges !

• Research Sexism

• Women Who Initiate Domestic Violence

• Member of Parliament Testifies to Mother's Abuse of Father

• Jan Logie: Man-Hating as a Religion

• Overview of Fiebert's Annotated Domestic Violence Bibliography

• Corrupt Justice Ministry Faking Statistics and the Absence of Investigative Journalism and Academic Freedom in New Zealand

• No Evidence from Feminist Lawyers and No Statistics from the Feminist Media -- when it comes to Core Propaganda Issues