Andrew Little Lies Like a Girl.
Peter Zohrab 2018
(Open Letter to the Minister of Justice)
Dear Mr. Little,
The above webpage announces the names of your so-called "Family Justice
reforms experts", including Ruth
Busch, who you call "an expert on family violence". However,
she is just a retired Law teacher.
You have a Law degree -- as do I -- and both of us know very well that the
Law includes statutes, rules and regulations, but does not include substantive
matters, such as Family Violence, which comes under Psychology. A competent
Psychologist who studied Family Violence would be knowledgeable about many
of the works listed in Professor Martin Fiebert's Annotated
Domestic Violence Bibliography , which
examines 286 scholarly investigations: 221 empirical studies and 65
reviews and/or analyses, which demonstrate that women
are as physically aggressive, or more aggressive, than men in their relationships
with their spouses or male partners.
Therefore Ruth Busch cannot possibly be, as far as her previous teaching
activities are concerned, "an expert on family violence". As you
presumably also know, she has apparently worked closely with a Psychologist
from Waikato University, Neville
Robertson. The Green Party supports your Labour-led Government and Jan
Logie, the Green MP, is your Under-Secretary for Justice (Domestic and Sexual
Violence Issues). So it must be that Jan Logie, who is a Fascist, man-hating
Dyke, wanted Ruth
Busch, who is another Fascist, man-hating dyke, to be your so-called "expert
on family violence" -- perhaps because they couldn't trust Neville Robertson
to be anti-male enough.
Nevertheless, she is not "an expert on family
violence", so you are a liar!
In Section II "A Foreword to Christine's Story", they make it
clear what the "factual details" are that they think are needed
to retrospectively justify the recommendations of the Bristol Inquiry which
resulted in the Fascist Domestic Violence Act that we have had since 1995.
They state at the beginning of Section II:
This article is essentially Christine Bristol's story.
In case that is not clear enough, they go on to refer (four sentences further
rejecting claims of 'objectivity' and 'detachment'.
Unlike you (I guess), I have studied Psychology as well as Law, including
the Massey University third-year paper "The Practice of Psychological
Research", during which Antonia
Lyons taught us that there was no such thing as objectivity. I dropped
out of that paper (in 2007) when she refused to permit me to carry out some
research on Domestic Violence.
I put the following points to you:
If someone does not believe in objectivity, they
have no business teaching at a university at taxpayers' expense, because
all that they can ever teach will be subjective, by their own definition;
If they do not believe in objectivity, they are
bound to be more subjective than other people, since most people at least
try to be objective when teaching Psyhology;
A Psychologist who does not try to be objective
is of no use to Parliament or the legal system, since both Parliament and
the legal system strive to achieve objectivity.
Scum like Ruth Busch, Jan Logie and Neville Robertson
only ever consider the woman's side of any marital situation.
If you are competent as a Lawyer, you will be aware
of the fundamental Human Rights principle Audi
Alteram Partem, i.e. Hear Both Sides.
It is a tragedy that Ruth Busch's parents survived
the Jewish Genocide, because she and Neville Robertson are far worse than
Hitler. Countless men and children have suffered at the hands of stupid
politicians, police, lawyers and judges who have been influenced by their
26 July 2019