Home > Issues > Human Rights for Men > Hypocrisy of UN Secretary-General on Human Rights

The Black Ribbon Campaign

Empowering Men:

fighting feminist lies

Hypocrisy of UN Secretary-General on Human Rights

Peter Zohrab 2017

Home Page Articles about Issues 1000 links
alt.mens-rights FAQ Sex, Lies & Feminism Quotations
Male-Friendly Lawyers, Psychologists & Paralegals Email us ! Site-map
(Open Letter to United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres)

Dear Mr. Guterres,

 

It is extremely hypocritical of you to have stated the following, if they are indeed your words:

"The corpus of human rights is indivisible and interdependent. We cannot pick and choose, emphasizing some and ignoring others."

I certainly agree with you that we must forcibly resist calls to reinstate torture, by the way. However, the United Nations as a whole, including the Human Rights Council, totally ignores the human rights of men (Article 26 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), about Sex Discrimination) and the human rights of unborn children (Article 6 of the ICCPR on the Right to Life, as well as Article 16). Indeed, you actually oppress men and unborn children by prioritising women's convenience over men's rights and the rights of unborn children and by totally ignoring the rights of men.

The United Nations also practises a fashionable, Fascist policy of so-called "Diversity", which tramples on Article 26 of the ICCPR, about Sex Discrimination. The ICCPR is about individual rights, whereas so-called "Diversity" is about so-called "group rights", which do not legally exist. The United Nations itself has employment policies which are based on ensuring the adequate representation of its member states, and that is understandable, since nation states are the legal constituent parts of the United Nations. However, the legal constituent parts of those nation states are individual human beings -- not groups. The women who gain jobs at the expense of better-qualified men then proceed, armed with their primitive Feminist ideology (which is also your primitive Feminist ideology), to oppress men by instituting other sexist and anti-male policies and decisions. For example, the World Health Organisation, which is headed by Margaret Chan, lists Women's Health as a health topic, but totally ignores Men's Health -- just as you totally ignore Men's Rights!

You probably have no idea, even, what men's rights might be, so I refer you, for example, to this Manifesto.

I would also like to refer you, as an example, to the Human Rights Council's Universal Periodical Review (2009) of New Zealand. Starting on page 6, various countries on the Human Rights Council make comments about Human Rights in relation to New Zealand. By my count, 15 of these comments mentioned women, one mentioned children, and absolutely none mentioned men!

I have, unlike you, a Law degree (amongst others), and I have studied Human Rights law. I am aware that many people in the legal profession treat "sex discrimination" as if it were something that only women suffer from. They do not have this attitude because there is any evidence of this! In my experience, these people are very stupid and have been soaked in Feminist propaganda from a young age. Therefore they simply do not look for sex discrimination that might be practised by women or that men might suffer from -- with the possible exception of sex discrimination in the workplace -- to a limited extent.

I urge you to realise that corpus of human rights is indivisible and interdependent. We cannot pick and choose, emphasizing some and ignoring others!

See also the Portuguese version of my book, Sex, Lies and Feminism: Sexo, Mentiras e Feminismo.

 

See also:

Anti-Male Discrimination in a Human Rights Textbook

FAQ

Webmaster

Peter Douglas Zohrab

Latest Update

13 June 2018

Top