(Open Letter to the Minister of Justice)
Dear Amy Adams,
I am writing to suggest that you abolish the Human Rights Commission
(HRC). I have had a lot of experience with it over the years,
and there is clear evidence that it does not even understand Human Rights.
It has favourite genders and ethnic groups and it actively oppresses
the ones that it doesn't like. I am of mixed ethnicity, I have
lived in and visited a large number of countries, and I speak a large
number of languages to various extents. Consequently, unlike the
vast majority of other people, I speak about ethnic groups on the basis
of knowing what
they actually say to each other about other ethnic groups -- rather
than on the basis of what their PR people say to the media! I
am also an expert on gender issues from a Men's Rights point of view,
being the author of the book, Sex, Lies &
Feminism.
The HRC has a Commissioner with responsibility for women, but no
Commissioner with responsibility for men. Consequently, it disseminates
anti-male propaganda (e.g. on Domestic Violence) and promotes anti-male
agendas, such as the White Ribbon Campaign. The Human Rights Commission
website even advertises
a White Ribbon Mountain Bike Relay . Erin Pizzey, who founded
one of the World's first women's refuges, and received death-threats
from Feminists, owns a non-sexist
version of a White Ribbon website. She interviews Professor
Martin Fiebert, who has an
annotated bibliography of Domestic Violence research, which "examines
286 scholarly investigations: 221 empirical studies and 65 reviews and/or
analyses, which demonstrate that women are as physically aggressive,
or more aggressive, than men in their relationships with their spouses
or male partners." The Fascist Human Rights Commission,
in effect, encourages women to assault men, knowing that all blame is
likely to be attached to the male victim of their violence, because
of Fascist propaganda like that of the Human Rights Commission.
On 23 November 2014, Dr. Jackie Blue, the Human Rights Commission's
EEO Commissioner, appeared on TV One's Q & A programme wearing a
white ribbon. That is gross sexism, since the White Ribbon Campaign
sends the signal to Society that violence by women against men is perfectly
acceptable, and that only violence against women is any cause for concern.
She obviously does not have the intellectual capacity to understand
the word "Equal" in the word "Equal Employment Opportunities",
which appears in her job title. In other word, she is a
gross sexist, and should be sacked immediately. I realise that
the National Party was keen to get her out of its caucus, but she should
have been given a job as a coal miner or forestry worker, because we
need EQUAL numbers of women being killed in the workplace -- instead
of 90% of the victims of workplace accidents being men. Perhaps
Jackie Blue could be sent alone down the Pike River mine to retrieve
the bodies of the 29 men?
Not only that, but the vicious, man-hating Jackie Blue is featured
in an article entitled "Violence
costs women, children and the New Zealand economy", which is
grossly sexist. It refers to the Glenn
Inquiry, which, methodologically, is a complete joke -- merely quotes
from a selection of gripes made by whoever happened to contact the Inquiry
and then (without any intelligent academic discussion whatsoever) arrives
at some conclusions. Moreover, it ignored the input which it received
from men, as far as its conclusions were concerned. If Jackie
Blue had the slightest competence, she would see that the Glenn Inquiry
only looked for violence against women and children, and so it only
found violence against women and children. That is predetermination.
As you know, that is a breach of Natural Justice. Jackie Blue
is nothing more than a vicious man-hater who is waging war on men.
Over the years, I have made many pro-male complaints to the HRC, and
none have been accepted by it -- except for three which related to sexist,
anti-male job advertisements. See Human
Rights Commission supports Protest at Sexist Advertisement
and Repeated Anti-Male
Discrimination by Female Newspaper and Female Restaurant (involving
two complaints). Even then, in one of these cases, the HRC failed
to action my complaint and I had to contact them again to get any action
taken on it. The only reason the HRC does take men's employment
issues seriously is that its counterpart in the United Kingdom does
so, and the New Zealand HRC takes it as its model.
Eventually I decided to make an Official Information Act request to
the HRC about my previous complaints, and you can see that one of my
earlier complaint letters had had a couple of rude, derogatory and/or
abusive Post-it notes placed on it by HRC staff. I don't know
what "Mr. F.O.A.D." is supposed to mean, but presumably it
is something abusive referring to me. You will see that this document
has been censored by the crossing out of two words, so that they cannot
be read. You will also see the letter of apology which I received
from the HRC.
From the content of that letter of complaint you will also see that
someone at the HRC took it upon herself to send me some unsolicited
propaganda from the HRC. So not only does the HRC ignore pro-men
arguments but it monitors the airwaves and polices views which it disagrees
with! In addition, you will see my reference to the fact that
the HRC connived in the rewriting of the rules governing the physical
testing of male and female recruits to the Police Force, with the effect
of allowing females into the force who cannot meet the male standards
-- circumventing the spirit of the Human Rights Act 1993.
|
I am related to the late Jeremy
Pope, whose last job was as a Human Rights Commissioner. I
have had quite a bit to do with him and his family, both when they lived
in Akatarawa and (much later) when we were both living in London and
he was the head of the legal section of the Commonwealth Secretariat.
Nevertheless, although he emailed me about family history matters, he
never communicated with me about Men's Rights issues, although he must
have been well aware that I was an activist in that area. The
Commonwealth Secretariat, like the United Nations, peddles anti-male
lies about domestic violence, so you might have expected him to want
to hear my point of view on such issues. But no.
He was one of the two people behind the Citizens
For Rowling organisation which tried to prevent the reelection of
National Party Prime Minister Robert
Muldoon. That was a very hypocritical organisation, since
Rowling (the Labour Party leader) inspired no enthusiasm at all, and
the real motive for the existence of the organisation was a hatred for
Robert Muldoon. His non-communication with me on Men's Rights
issues and his involvement with the Citizens For Rowling organisation
both point to the hard ideological outlook and hypocrisy that are typical
of people of the type who generally work for the Human Rights Commission.
I could also mention that I took the picture of him and his wife that
appears in the 1980s coffee-table book which they wrote -- but they
gave me no acknowledgement in the book.
One friend of Jeremy Pope's is Chris
Laidlaw, with whom I corresponded when he was Race Relations Conciliator.
I mention him because he later complained that one All Black coach (John
Mitchell) only seemed to pick White players. I did not disagree
with him, particularly, but I wrote and pointed out that he had a double
standard, because the All Black Sevens' coach, up till then, had only
seemed to pick Non-White players! I said that I did not care what
colour the players' skins were, but that I thought he shouldn't apply
double standards!
Similarly, when Rajen
Prasad was Race Relations Conciliator, I saw him on TV showing obvious
displeasure when he heard a male voice with an upper-class, southern
English accent. It was quite an unusual accent -- not your ordinary
RP accent. Later I happened to go to the Race Relations Office
and spoke to his receptionist, who was an English woman, and who indicated
(although I cannot remember her actual words) that he in fact didn't
like English people. My point here is that Human Rights Commission-type
people have tended to see males and Whites as the enemy, and females
and Non-Whites as the Good Guys -- whereas this is a gross oversimplification
of racial and gender issues.
The current government has apparently managed to get a
squash player and a
rugby administrator appointed to top jobs at the Human Rights Commission.
This would have brought the Human Rights Commission into disrepute,
if it wasn't already there! The squash-player Race Relations Commissioner,
Susan Devoy, is a racist, who criticised the Act Party for campaigning
for equality between Maoris and others! Mind you, as I have
pointed out, equality for Maoris should include equal rights to get
the courts to rule on traditional Maori rights
to the seabed and foreshore -- without limiting
those rights by Act of Parliament, and I am sure that the Act Party
is opposed to that.
See also:
|
